Loading...

Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run

Loading...
Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run - Apa khabar sahabat TIMES NEW MALAYSIA, Dalam artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan tajuk Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run, kami telah menyediakan dengan baik untuk artikel ini anda membaca dan memuat turun maklumat di dalamnya. mudah-mudahan mengisi jawatan Artikel BOLASEPAK, Artikel NEWS, Artikel PERNIAGAAN, kita menulis ini, anda boleh memahami. Nah, selamat membaca.

Tajuk : Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run
link : Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run

lihat juga


Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run

Well-educated, high profile CEOs sometimes become synonymous with their companies.

Steve Jobs and Apple, Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, and Jeff Bezos and Amazon. It’s hard to separate the man from the operation.

However, investing in a company simply based on its leadership might not be the best strategy, according to Warren Buffett.

Rather, as he said in an interview with the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) in May 2010, one should instead in invest in a business that any fool can run.

The interview comes from a document dump from the National Archives, which released transcripts, meeting agendas, and confidentiality agreements from the FCIC. The group was set up by Congress in the aftermath of the to look into the causes of the event.

When asked by the FCIC what attracted him to the management of Moody’s — the credit ratings agency that was at the center of the mortgage-backed securities debacle — when he made his initial investment, Buffett responded:

I knew nothing about the management of Moody’s. The — I’ve also said many times in reports and elsewhere that when a management with reputation for brilliance gets hooked up with a business with a reputation for bad economics, it’s the reputation of the business that remains intact.

If you’ve got a good enough business, if you have a monopoly newspaper, if you have a network television station — I’m talking of the past — you know, your idiot nephew could run it. And if you’ve got a really good business, it doesn’t make any difference.”

Of course, there are some differences when it comes to management. Anyone who’s had a bad boss can tell you that. However, the way Buffett is thinking about it here, as he says in the interview, is if 10 years ago someone owned the only newspaper in town, then they’re the person with the pricing power — and that’s a good business.

He said something more or less the same in the case of Moody’s, noting that very few businesses had the competitive position that rating agencies like Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s had. And he even went as far as calling them a “natural duopoly to some extent,” since both basically became the standard for regulators.

Tellingly, when asked whether he had ever pressed for the election of any board member, Buffett responded: “If I thought they needed me, I wouldn’t have bought the stock.”

NOW WATCH: This man spent 6 weeks working undercover in an iPhone factory in China — here’s what it was like

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

Read more stories on Business Insider, Malaysian edition of the world’s fastest-growing business and technology news website.



✍ Sumber Pautan : ☕ Business InsiderBusiness Insider

Kredit kepada pemilik laman asal dan sekira berminat untuk meneruskan bacaan sila klik link atau copy paste ke web server : http://ift.tt/2qHkmAC

(✿◠‿◠)✌ Mukah Pages : Pautan Viral Media Sensasi Tanpa Henti. Memuat-naik beraneka jenis artikel menarik setiap detik tanpa henti dari pelbagai sumber. Selamat membaca dan jangan lupa untuk 👍 Like & 💕 Share di media sosial anda!

Well-educated, high profile CEOs sometimes become synonymous with their companies.

Steve Jobs and Apple, Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, and Jeff Bezos and Amazon. It’s hard to separate the man from the operation.

However, investing in a company simply based on its leadership might not be the best strategy, according to Warren Buffett.

Rather, as he said in an interview with the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) in May 2010, one should instead in invest in a business that any fool can run.

The interview comes from a document dump from the National Archives, which released transcripts, meeting agendas, and confidentiality agreements from the FCIC. The group was set up by Congress in the aftermath of the to look into the causes of the event.

When asked by the FCIC what attracted him to the management of Moody’s — the credit ratings agency that was at the center of the mortgage-backed securities debacle — when he made his initial investment, Buffett responded:

I knew nothing about the management of Moody’s. The — I’ve also said many times in reports and elsewhere that when a management with reputation for brilliance gets hooked up with a business with a reputation for bad economics, it’s the reputation of the business that remains intact.

If you’ve got a good enough business, if you have a monopoly newspaper, if you have a network television station — I’m talking of the past — you know, your idiot nephew could run it. And if you’ve got a really good business, it doesn’t make any difference.”

Of course, there are some differences when it comes to management. Anyone who’s had a bad boss can tell you that. However, the way Buffett is thinking about it here, as he says in the interview, is if 10 years ago someone owned the only newspaper in town, then they’re the person with the pricing power — and

Loading...
that’s a good business.

He said something more or less the same in the case of Moody’s, noting that very few businesses had the competitive position that rating agencies like Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s had. And he even went as far as calling them a “natural duopoly to some extent,” since both basically became the standard for regulators.

Tellingly, when asked whether he had ever pressed for the election of any board member, Buffett responded: “If I thought they needed me, I wouldn’t have bought the stock.”

NOW WATCH: This man spent 6 weeks working undercover in an iPhone factory in China — here’s what it was like

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

Read more stories on Business Insider, Malaysian edition of the world’s fastest-growing business and technology news website.



✍ Sumber Pautan : ☕ Business InsiderBusiness Insider

Kredit kepada pemilik laman asal dan sekira berminat untuk meneruskan bacaan sila klik link atau copy paste ke web server : http://ift.tt/2qHkmAC

(✿◠‿◠)✌ Mukah Pages : Pautan Viral Media Sensasi Tanpa Henti. Memuat-naik beraneka jenis artikel menarik setiap detik tanpa henti dari pelbagai sumber. Selamat membaca dan jangan lupa untuk 👍 Like & 💕 Share di media sosial anda!



dengan itu Perkara Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run

yang semua artikel Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run Kali ini, diharapkan dapat memberi manfaat kepada anda semua. Okay, jumpa di lain post artikel.

Kini anda membaca artikel Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run dengan alamat pautan https://timesnewmalaysia.blogspot.com/2017/05/warren-buffett-explains-why-good.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

Related Posts :

0 Response to "Warren Buffett explains why a good business is one ‘your idiot nephew’ could run"

Catat Ulasan

Loading...