Loading...

James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump

Loading...
James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump - Apa khabar sahabat TIMES NEW MALAYSIA, Dalam artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan tajuk James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump, kami telah menyediakan dengan baik untuk artikel ini anda membaca dan memuat turun maklumat di dalamnya. mudah-mudahan mengisi jawatan Artikel BOLASEPAK, Artikel NEWS, Artikel PERNIAGAAN, kita menulis ini, anda boleh memahami. Nah, selamat membaca.

Tajuk : James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump
link : James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump

lihat juga


James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump

James Comey

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

James Comey.

FBI Director James Comey explained Wednesday why he made comments in late October about reopening the investigation into then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s emails while not making any remarks about the bureau’s ongoing investigation into President Donald Trump, then the GOP presidential nominee, and his associates’ potential collusion with Russia.

Comey said the reason was because he had testified under oath that the Clinton investigation was wrapped up, while he had never commented publicly on the FBI’s investigation into Trump and Russia.

During the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that Comey was testifying at, Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont asked about the discrepancy.

“You sent a letter to the Senate and House that you were reviewing additional emails that could be relevant,” Leahy said. “Both investigations were open, but you still only commented on one.”

Comey defended his decision.

“I commented on October 28 in a letter to the chair and ranking [members] of the Oversight Committees that we were taking additional steps involving the Clinton email investigation because I had testified under oath repeatedly that we were done — that we were finished there,” Comey said.

“With respect to the Russia investigation, we treated it like we did with the Clinton investigation. We didn’t say a word about it until months into it, and then the only thing we’ve confirmed so far about this — the same thing as with the Clinton investigation — that we are investigating.”

He continued: “And I would expect that we’re not going to say another peep about it until we’re done. And I don’t know what will be said when we’re done, but that’s how we handled the Clinton investigation as well.”

Comey sent a letter to congressional leaders in late October — just 11 days before the November election — noting that the FBI was reviewing emails tied to Clinton’s private server that were found as a part of a separate investigation into disgraced New York City politician Anthony Weiner. The letter, which implied a reopening of the investigation into Clinton’s emails, reverberated through both the Clinton and Trump campaigns.

Comey announced days later that nothing was found in the additional emails.

Then in March, Comey announced during a House Intelligence Committee hearing that the FBI was investigating potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials to help swing the election in Trump’s favor. He noted that the investigation launched in late July.

Leahy noted that Comey repeatedly commented on the Clinton investigation while saying nothing about the probe into Trump’s associates. Leahy said that during his four decades as a US senator, he can’t remember seeing anything like the FBI’s actions on the Clinton investigation.

“Was it appropriate for you to comment on one investigation repeatedly and not say anything about the other?” Leahy asked.

“I think so,” Comey said. 

“I think I treated both investigations consistently under the same principles,” he added. “People forget, we would not confirm the existence of the Hillary Clinton email investigation until three months after it began, even though it began with a public referral and the candidate herself talked about it. In October of 2015 we confirmed it existed.”

NOW WATCH: Trump’s budget director unveils photos of what the border wall may look like

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

Read more stories on Business Insider, Malaysian edition of the world’s fastest-growing business and technology news website.



✍ Sumber Pautan : ☕ Business InsiderBusiness Insider

Kredit kepada pemilik laman asal dan untuk meneruskan bacaan di laman asal sila klik link atau copy paste ke web server : http://ift.tt/2oYigPB

(✿◠‿◠)✌ Mukah Pages : Pautan Viral Media Sensasi Tanpa Henti. Memuat-naik beraneka jenis artikel menarik setiap detik tanpa henti dari pelbagai sumber. Selamat membaca dan jangan lupa untuk 👍 Like & 💕 Share di media sosial anda!

James Comey

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

James Comey.

FBI Director James Comey explained Wednesday why he made comments in late October about reopening the investigation into then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s emails while not making any remarks about the bureau’s ongoing investigation into President Donald Trump, then the GOP presidential nominee, and his associates’ potential collusion with Russia.

Comey said the reason was because he had testified under oath that the Clinton investigation was wrapped up, while he had never commented publicly on the FBI’s investigation into Trump and Russia.

During the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that Comey was testifying at, Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont asked about the discrepancy.

“You sent a letter to the Senate and House that you were reviewing additional emails that could be relevant,” Leahy said. “Both investigations were open, but you still only commented on one.”

Comey defended his decision.

“I commented on October 28 in a letter to the chair and ranking [members] of the Oversight Committees that we were taking additional steps involving the Clinton email investigation because I had testified under oath repeatedly that we were done — that we were finished there,” Comey said.

“With respect to the Russia investigation, we treated it like we did with the Clinton investigation. We didn’t say a word about it until months into it, and then the only thing we’ve confirmed so far about this — the same thing as with the Clinton investigation — that we are investigating.”

He continued: “And I would expect that we’re not going to say another peep about it until we’re done. And I don’t know what will be said when we’re done, but that’s how we handled the Clinton investigation as well.”

Comey sent a letter to congressional leaders in late October — just 11 days before the November election — noting that the FBI was reviewing emails tied to Clinton’s private server that were found as a part of a separate investigation into disgraced New York City politician Anthony Weiner. The letter, which implied a reopening of the investigation into Clinton’s emails, reverberated through both the Clinton and Trump campaigns.

Comey announced days later that nothing was found in the additional emails.

Then in March, Comey announced during a House

Loading...
Intelligence Committee hearing that the FBI was investigating potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials to help swing the election in Trump’s favor. He noted that the investigation launched in late July.

Leahy noted that Comey repeatedly commented on the Clinton investigation while saying nothing about the probe into Trump’s associates. Leahy said that during his four decades as a US senator, he can’t remember seeing anything like the FBI’s actions on the Clinton investigation.

“Was it appropriate for you to comment on one investigation repeatedly and not say anything about the other?” Leahy asked.

“I think so,” Comey said. 

“I think I treated both investigations consistently under the same principles,” he added. “People forget, we would not confirm the existence of the Hillary Clinton email investigation until three months after it began, even though it began with a public referral and the candidate herself talked about it. In October of 2015 we confirmed it existed.”

NOW WATCH: Trump’s budget director unveils photos of what the border wall may look like

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

Read more stories on Business Insider, Malaysian edition of the world’s fastest-growing business and technology news website.



✍ Sumber Pautan : ☕ Business InsiderBusiness Insider

Kredit kepada pemilik laman asal dan untuk meneruskan bacaan di laman asal sila klik link atau copy paste ke web server : http://ift.tt/2oYigPB

(✿◠‿◠)✌ Mukah Pages : Pautan Viral Media Sensasi Tanpa Henti. Memuat-naik beraneka jenis artikel menarik setiap detik tanpa henti dari pelbagai sumber. Selamat membaca dan jangan lupa untuk 👍 Like & 💕 Share di media sosial anda!



dengan itu Perkara James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump

yang semua artikel James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump Kali ini, diharapkan dapat memberi manfaat kepada anda semua. Okay, jumpa di lain post artikel.

Kini anda membaca artikel James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump dengan alamat pautan https://timesnewmalaysia.blogspot.com/2017/05/james-comey-explained-why-he-sent.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

Related Posts :

0 Response to "James Comey explained why he sent the letter about the Clinton email investigation but didn’t disclose the probe into Trump"

Catat Ulasan

Loading...